Soventure / Case study
Making travel insurance
easier to understand and buy
- Role
- Senior UX Designer
- Period
- 2023–2026
- Product
- Consumer travel-insurance marketplace
- 20% higher conversion
- vs. parent site InsureMyTrip
- Team
- Graphic Designer · Insurance Specialist · Front-End Developer
Learning to design for consumer behavior
Fewer steps didn't make a better journey.
Soventure's travel-insurance marketplace had a comparison problem: plans looked alike, and travelers couldn't tell which one would actually cover their trip. Over three years, I owned the plan comparison, quote, and purchase experience, working with a front-end developer, an insurance specialist, and a graphic designer.
Our first big test challenged our own assumption. We expected that moving the quote form onto the homepage would shorten the journey. It didn't. Travelers who reached a dedicated quote page finished more often / with fewer drop-offs, so we kept the extra step and put the effort into what happened after it.
Painpoint
Travel plans are specific. Insurance summaries can be frustratingly general. Travelers needed to understand which cancellation reasons and activities a policy covered before they could judge whether it suited their trip.
Email exchange about backcountry and heli-skiing coverage.What research revealed
Medical coverage and trip cancellation mattered, but simply displaying a cancellation benefit wasn’t enough. Travelers wanted to understand which reasons for cancellation were actually covered. Activity coverage was another key consideration. Benefits such as baggage delay carried less weight in the decision.
Making plans easier to compare
Comparing Squaremouth and TravelInsurance.com with Soventure highlighted how much the structure of a results card matters. Dense lists require travelers to read each plan line by line; a consistent, labeled grid lets them find the same benefit in the same place across plans.
Soventure’s cards give coverage limits fixed positions and keep the plan name and total price visually distinct. Category tags explain what makes a plan different, while ratings and review counts provide trust signals. Benefit-based filters help travelers narrow the results before comparing the details.
Reducing friction at the point of purchase
The opportunity wasn’t another feature. It was removing decisions, consolidating requirements, and answering last-minute questions before purchase.
What changed
Soventure converted at a 20% higher rate than InsureMyTrip. Based on that result, most of Soventure's design — including the quote results page, plan row layout, and shortened purchase flow — was adopted into the parent site.
A decision under disagreement
Our head of ecom wanted to keep the upgrade section and provider terms in the main purchase path, concerned that removing them would hurt average order value or expose the company to risk. I argued for pulling them out based on funnel data / user research, accepting a possible AOV trade-off for a faster, clearer path to purchase. We tested it, and the conversion gain held up — the flow was later adopted into InsureMyTrip.
Product journey
From trip details
to protected travel.
Follow the purchase journey from understanding the offer through entering trip details, comparing plans, and completing checkout.
What I learned
Reflection
Speed and completeness pulled against each other throughout this project. Removing the upgrade section from checkout was the clearest example: I chose a faster path to purchase and accepted the risk of lower average order value, and the conversion lift more than justified it.
Related / Research & product strategy
The Customer Journey We Didn’t Own →
AI-assisted insurance shopping, the limits of observed evidence, and a proposed study of where the marketplace remains valuable.




